Exploring Selective Exposure and Selective Avoidance Behavior in Social Media

ABSTRACT

This study investigates social media users' preferences of encountering or actively avoiding undesired content and conflicts in social interaction with others. Based on a nationwide survey (N=3706) conducted in Finland and using principal component analysis, we identify three different types of social media use in relation to online information sharing and social interaction: conformist, provocative and protective. We then modelled those variations according to demographic variables and subjective life satisfaction. We found that women are more likely to use social media in a conformist and protective way whereas men have a higher probability to be provocative. We also found that younger and more educated people have a higher probability to use social media in a conformist and protective way. Finally, we suggest that subjective life satisfaction more powerfully predicts provocative use compared to age or education.

References

1. Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. The benefits of Facebook "friends": Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 12(4), 1143--1168.
2. Sebastián Valenzuela, Namsu Park, Kerk F. Kee; Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4), 875--901.
3. Hyun Jung Oh, Elif Ozkaya, and Robert LaRose. 2014. How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior 30, 69--78.
4. Cass Sunstein. 2001. Echo chambers: Bush v. Gore, impeachment, and beyond. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Leon Festinger. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
6. Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Cornelia Mothes, Benjamin K. Johnson, Axel Westerwick, and Wolfgang Donsbach. 2015. Political Online Information Searching in Germany and the United States: Confirmation Bias, Source Credibility, and Attitude Impacts. Journal of Communication 65 (2015), 489--511.
7. Alice E. Marwick and danah boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society 13(1), 114--133.
8. Qinfeng Zhu, Marko Skoric, and Fei Shen. 2017. I Shield Myself From Thee: Selective Avoidance on Social Media During Political Protests. Political Communication 34(1), 112--131.
9. Sanna Malinen. 2015. 'Unsociability' as Boundary Regulation on Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2015).
10. Jesse Fox and Jennifer J. Moreland. 2015. The Dark Side of Social Networking Sites: An Exploration of the Relational and Psychological Stressors Associated with Facebook use and Affordances. Computers in Human Behavior 45(4), 168--176.
11. Alexander J. Van Deursen, and Jan A Van Dijk. 2014. The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New media & society 16(3), 507--526.
12. Jan Schradie. 2011. The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetic 39(2), 145--168.
13. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF). 2017. Use of information and communications technology by individuals {e-publication}. ISSN=2341-8710. Helsinki: Statistics Finland {referred: 29.1.2018}. Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/tup_en.html
14. Ilkka Koiranen, Teo Keipi, Teo, Aki Koivula, and Pekka Räsänen. 2017. The different uses of social media -- A population-level study in Finland. Working Papers in Economic Sociology (IX). University of Turku, Turku.
15. Niki Panteli and Ben Marder. 2017. Constructing and enacting normality online across generations: The case of social networking sites. Information Technology & People 30(2), 282--300.
16. Petter Bae Brandtzæg, Marika Lüders, and Jan Håvard Skjetne. 2010. Too many Facebook "friends"? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 26(11-12), 1006--1030.
17. Sean A. Munson and Paul Resnick. 2010. Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1457--1466.
18. Aki Koivula, Teo Keipi, Ilkka Koiranen and Pekka Räsänen. 2018 A middle-aged social Internet with a millennial exodus? Changes in identifications with online communities between 2009 and 2017 in Finland. In Proceedings of International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media. Springer, Cham.
19. James Carifio and Rocco J. Perla. 2007. Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences 3(3), 106--116.
20. Teo Keipi, Matti Näsi, Atte Oksanen, and Pekka Räsänen. 2016. Online hate and harmful content: Cross-national perspectives Vol. 200. Taylor & Francis.
21. Kristen Harrison and Veronika Hefner. 2008. Media, body image, and eating disorders, in Calvert, S. and Wilson, B. (Eds), The Handbook of Children, Media, and Development. Blackwell, Malden, MA, 381--406.
22. Jane D. Brown and Piotr S. Bobkowski. 2011. Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents' health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence 21(1), 95--113.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms

      • Social media

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI design and evaluation methods

      • User studies